A product development method is just a shared way to go from idea to something real—with clarity on stages, owners, and learning loops.
Why I'd bother having one
- Scope and decisions don't live in one person's head
- Knowledge transfer survives vacations and attrition
- Collaboration has a default path
- You waste less time on low-value thrash
Stages I still see in most healthy paths
| Stage | Intent |
|---|---|
| Ideate / screen | Kill weak ideas early |
| Define | Problem, ICP, success metrics |
| Prototype / MVP | Learn cheaply |
| Design & build | Iterate with evidence |
| Validate | Quality + desirability |
| Launch & learn | Operate, measure, decide |
Waterfall vs agile is less interesting than whether you learn before you over-invest.
A Technical PM Certification helps you run these loops with eng.
More in the newsletter.