GUIDE 2026

Agile transformation: How I’d make the change practical

Josh Fechter
By
Josh Fechter
Josh Fechter
Josh Fechter
Josh Fechter is the co-founder of Product HQ, founder of Technical Writer HQ, and founder and head of product of Squibler. You…
More About Josh →
×

Start with the problem

I would not begin an agile transformation by announcing a framework. I would ask what is not working for customers and teams: slow decisions, risky releases, hidden dependencies, or constantly changing priorities. The transformation needs a problem grounded in reality.

The approach I would take

I map work from customer signal to shipped product and look for queues, handoffs, rework, unclear decisions, and approval delays. Then I choose one valuable constraint to improve with a willing product area. The goal is to learn which changes work in this context, not to create a showcase team.

I clarify outcomes and decision rights, shorten feedback loops through research, prototypes, smaller releases, or automated checks, and bring organization-level constraints to leadership. Team-level agility cannot compensate for annual funding decisions or conflicting priorities.

Signals I would use

I watch lead time, blocked work, rework, release quality, customer learning, and team confidence. I use metrics to ask questions, never to rank teams. I also listen for whether people understand the goal and can challenge assumptions.

I avoid renaming roles without changing decisions, using story points as productivity scores, and treating ceremony attendance as progress. An agile transformation succeeds when the organization learns faster about valuable problems and acts on that learning.

A practical check

I make the change visible through a small number of experiments with owners and review dates. That gives leadership something more useful than a maturity label. It also lets teams say which practices help and which are adding work without improving the outcome.

My bottom line

I use this framework to make the work explicit, not to create ceremony for its own sake. Start with the decision, show the evidence, make ownership visible, and revisit the approach when the product or context changes.

If you are building the fundamentals behind this kind of work, the Product HQ product management certification is a useful next step. I also share practical lessons in the Product HQ newsletter.

Josh Fechter
Josh Fechter
Josh Fechter is the co-founder of Product HQ, founder of Technical Writer HQ, and founder and head of product of Squibler. You can connect with him on LinkedIn here.